Critics of the US criminal legal system frequently point to the Scandinavian model as an exemplar of effective and humane rehabilitation. But beyond the pictures of dormlike accommodations and descriptions of enlightened programming, does the Nordic approach really work—and could its lessons apply here?
Erika Gebo, professor and chair of the Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice, is a recognized expert in issues of urban violence and how crime and incarceration impact both individuals and communities. She is currently working with the Boston Public Health Commission on community-based violence intervention programs that work directly with returning citizens—individuals who were formerly incarcerated—and their families in communities with higher rates of violence as part of a Department of Justice grant. This summer, travel funds from a Whiting Fellowship allowed Gebo to briefly step away from this engrossing work for a perspective-changing visit to Sweden and Norway.
She discussed emerging research at the Stockholm Criminology Symposium, met with colleagues at the University of Oslo, and got an insider’s view of Norway’s prison system. There, she noted a greater emphasis on human rights, creating positive community connections, and incorporating the healing influence of nature into incarceration.
“In our reentry programs we are obviously very focused on survival needs: housing, employment, healthcare,” says Gebo. “In Norway they also work on building interpersonal relationships that will support people as they reintegrate into society, and teach them how to fill their free time with positive, meaningful activities. Incarcerated people have meals with their families, and they even go fishing, hiking, and horseback riding.”
The process is costly, but in the Scandinavian model that is seen as money well spent if it helps returning citizens build successful lives and avoid reoffending, explains Gebo. Still, there are cracks apparent in the system.
“We hear a lot about Nordic exceptionalism, and there are many positive practices that we can learn from,” says Gebo, “But they’re also dealing with some of the same issues we are, such as difficulty recruiting and retaining enough correctional employees and deciding how best to handle justice-involved youth.”
Gebo observed firsthand the rise in right-wing rhetoric focused on stricter law and order, and encountered some resistance to addressing issues that might strain the system. She says that while Scandinavian countries are rapidly becoming more multicultural, that diversity is often not reflected in staff or programming. During her visit, she also spoke with justice officials who were frustrated by staffing shortages that made it difficult to implement the activities and outings so central to their rehabilitation strategy.
“Conventional wisdom has been that the rest of the world can learn from their model, but no system is a Utopia and an exchange of ideas would benefit us all."
Returning exhilarated from the experience, Gebo now has nuanced insights from behind the walls of the Scandinavian criminal justice system to weigh in her research and share with her students—along with a new slate of international experts who can Zoom into her courses and perhaps even collaborate on future projects.
Learn more about faculty scholarship in the College of Arts & Sciences.
Contact
Greg Gatlin
Office of Public Affairs
617-573-8428
Andrea Grant
Office of Public Affairs
617-573-8410